If you can get them for a bargain, it is hard to go wrong. So, in short, whether the KG 2.2 meets your needs, depends on what your needs are, what the final prices is, and the condition the speakers are in. The Horn Mid/High speakers I built myself, and the horns are massively louder than the cone speakers, so I've had to turn them down substantially to get them balanced with the bass.īoth speakers would be considered mid-price-range consumer speakers.Īgain, this applies to the new Klipsch Reference, but the older KG 2.2 use a different type of tweeter, a metal diaphragm type not a horn. Also, the vocals are clearer and more present in the Horn speakers.
#Klipsch kg 4.2 speaker review full#
In my view, on the horn speakers, the guitar comes off light and airy, where as the guitar on the Dome speakers comes of more full and smooth. How well this will work for you depends on the quality of the speakers you are listening on.
#Klipsch kg 4.2 speaker review drivers#
Though worth very little given poor YouTube sound quality, I have speakers that have Dome/Cone drivers and Horn/Cone drivers. Assuming they are good speakers, and assuming they are relatively balanced, I actually like the sound of horns. Horn speaker have a very distinct sound that you either like or you don't. The Valdus are big and powerful, but they will not have the balance and clarity of Klipsch speakers.Īs to the New Klipsch Reference line, very good speakers, but uniquely Klipsch. However, in terms of quality of speakers, and clarity of sound, you simply can not compare Klipsch to Wharfedale Valdus.
Again, these, if they deteriorate, can be easily replaced for a modest price.
0 kommentar(er)
